Guarding Against Scope Creep in Clinical Informatics

Lessons from the Emergency Department Results Callback System

Posted by Sultan M. Babar, MD on February 25, 2024

Introduction

Clinical informatics is an ever-evolving field. The creation and refinement of systems like the Emergency Department (ED) Results Callback system stand as a testament to the delicate balance required between innovation and precision. Once such a system is in place and working well, there is an almost undeniable desire to expand the scope of such systems. This is commonly referred to as "scope creep," and it presents significant challenges, including diluting the system's effectiveness and leading to alert fatigue.

In my opinion, our implementation of the ED Results Callback system, designed to notify clinicians of certain test results that return after a patient has been discharged from the ED, epitomizes this balance. It's a solution that extends beyond software, embodying a complete workflow that seamlessly integrates with chosen technologies, demonstrating that the true measure of a system's impact lies in how well these components work in unison.

The Precision of Design

The ED Results Callback system was conceived with precise criteria to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the test results communicated. This was clearly communicated with all stakeholders and expectations were clarified.

This meticulous approach guaranteed that the system stays focused, effective, and highly pertinent to the needs it seeks to address. This illustrated that the real solutions in medical informatics are not just about software but about crafting workflows that enhance the utility of these technologies.

The Challenge of Scope Creep

One of my colleagues proposed that we expand the system's scope to include tests for patients currently admitted. However, I opined that this underscores the risks of scope creep. Such expansion could lead to unintended consequences:

  • Increased Volume of Alerts: Broadening the system's scope may result in a surge of alerts, many of which could be inactionable or redundant, effectively diluting the system's intended impact.
  • Alert Fatigue: The direct result of an increased alert volume is the heightened risk of alert fatigue among clinicians, which can undermine patient care.
  • Misaligned Solutions: The nuances of different tests and their actionable windows mean that a one-size-fits-all solution is almost impossible. This has the potential to compromise the system's efficacy.

Guarding Against Scope Creep

To safeguard the integrity and effectiveness of the ED Results Callback system, we embrace a multi-faceted approach:

  • Rooted in Rigor: Our commitment to the system's original principles celebrates the specificity required to meet clinical needs precisely. Each potential expansion is rigorously evaluated to ensure it enhances, rather than dilutes, the system's utility.
  • Dynamic Dialogue: Success hinges on the collective input of clinicians, IT professionals, and operational staff, whose diverse perspectives help shape decisions that are technically sound and grounded in clinical reality.
  • Calibrated Evolution: Adjustments are approached with surgical precision, emphasizing incremental innovation and rigorous testing to ensure every modification enhances functionality and aligns with our commitment to clinical excellence. Furthermore, we make sure that one solution is not used to address all problems, instead every problem is evaluated to ensure an optimal solution is used that fits well within our overall system.

Conclusion

The journey of the ED Results Callback system underscores that the effectiveness of clinical informatics solutions lies in their ability to blend software with workflows seamlessly. By resisting the temptation of scope creep and maintaining a laser focus on our original objectives, we ensure these systems remain powerful tools in the hands of clinicians, driving forward the mission of patient-centered care in the digital age.